SNOWMASS, COLO. – Advances in remote telemedical management show enormous promise as a means of preventing costly heart failure hospitalizations, William T. Abraham, MD, said at the Annual Cardiovascular Conference at Snowmass.
He characterized the decades-old conventional approach to heart failure management as a reactive strategy focused on making medication adjustments based upon weight changes and worsening signs and symptoms. But these physiologic markers of acute decompensation aren’t actionable; that is, they don’t occur until it’s too late to successfully intervene to prevent hospitalization.
Dr. William T. Abraham
“I hope to get you to begin to question how we have monitored heart failure patients for the past several decades, because intuitions have generally driven those approaches – and there are strong data to show that those intuitions are just wrong,” declared Dr. Abraham, professor of medicine, physiology, and cell biology and director of the division of cardiovascular medicine at Ohio State University in Columbus.
It’s now clear that objective, measurable changes in intracardiac and pulmonary artery pressures as well as increases in lung fluid volume precede symptomatic decompensation episodes by several weeks. These early harbingers are reliably detectable by telemedical monitoring via small implantable pressure sensors or, noninvasively, using wearable sensors embedded in a vest.
“By moving upstream, we hope to develop a more proactive preventive approach to managing heart failure patients so that we can implement a medical intervention during this presymptomatic phase of worsening heart failure and avert a heart failure hospitalization,” the cardiologist explained.
That has already been demonstrated in several studies in which remote physicians checked the home monitoring data daily and promptly increased the dose of diuretics when pressure readings or lung fluid volume climbed above normal: The elevated readings quickly retreated and heart failure hospitalizations occurred much less frequently than with conventional management.
“Well-structured outpatient care could reduce the need for hospital admission, facilitate early intervention, prevent crisis management, and avoid complications or disease management in these patients,” Dr. Abraham observed.
Finding best telemedicine options
But this high-tech patient management strategy is not quite ready for prime time use in daily clinical practice.
“We’re still sorting through this field and trying to figure out the best telemedicine options,” according to Dr. Abraham.
He cited several recent large, well-conducted randomized trials that have persuasively shown that there’s no point in applying home telemedicine in order to quickly respond to changes in a heart failure patient’s blood pressure, weight, and symptom status.
“The horse is already out of the barn at that point in time,” according to the cardiologist.
For example, the BEAT-HF (Better Effectiveness After Transition–Heart Failure) trial included 1,437 patients hospitalized for heart failure at eight California academic medical centers who were randomized to usual care or an intervention that combined health-coaching telephone calls and protocols for physician or nurse response to daily telemetric data on patient blood pressure, symptoms, heart rate, weight, and symptoms. The intervention turned out to have absolutely no effect on the 180-day rate of readmissions, which was roughly 50% in both groups (JAMA Intern Med. 2016 Mar;176[3]:310-8).
The PCDM (Patient-Centered Disease Management) trial was a multicenter Veterans Affairs study that randomized heart failure patients to usual care or a comprehensive intervention involving collaborative care by a cardiologist, psychiatrist, primary care physician, and nurse coordinator; screening and treatment for depression; and home telemonitoring of heart failure decompensation symptoms. The multifaceted intervention had no effect on the 1-year readmission rate (JAMA Intern Med. 2015 May;175[5]:725-32).
“To date, I would challenge you to find any adequately powered randomized, controlled trial in heart failure disease management that demonstrates that the way we’ve been doing things really keeps heart failure patients out of the hospital. So, it is time for a paradigm shift and some new technologies in our armamentarium,” Dr. Abraham said.
CardioMEMS system
Several remote telemedical management systems for heart failure, which measure early preclinical harbingers of acute decompensation, have received Food and Drug Administration approval. Many more are in development. Dr. Abraham highlighted two approved systems for which he was a coinvestigator in clinical trials.
The CardioMEMS system uses a pressure sensor the size of a small paper clip that is placed in a branch of the pulmonary artery, where it readily becomes endothelialized. Device implantation can be carried out by any cardiologist who can perform a right heart catheterization, be it an electrophysiologist, interventionalist, heart failure specialist, or general cardiologist. It takes only about an additional 7 minutes to deploy the sensor following a standard diagnostic right heart catheterization. The system doesn’t use a battery and has no moving parts.
“Now, with more than 10 years experience, we have yet to see a sensor failure. It’s a highly reliable system,” according to the cardiologist.
Once a day the patient lies down, pushes a button, and the sensor is simultaneously powered up while the data on pulmonary artery pressure waveforms and systolic and diastolic pressures is extracted using radiofrequency energy.
In the randomized, multicenter, controlled, single-blind CHAMPION (CardioMEMS Heart Sensor Allows Monitoring of Pressure to Improve Outcomes in NYHA Class III Heart Failure Patients) trial, Dr. Abraham and coinvestigators demonstrated that pulmonary artery pressure-guided heart failure management reduced the rate of heart failure hospitalizations in the CardioMEMS group by 33% during the first 18 months of the trial and by 48% in the subsequent 13 months (Lancet. 2016 Jan 30;387[10017]:453-61).
“It’s important to note that the results were positive in diastolic as well as systolic heart failure. Patients with a baseline left ventricular ejection fraction of 40% or more saw a 50% reduction in the risk of heart failure hospitalizations, and those with an LVEF of 50% or more saw a 70% reduction,” Dr. Abraham said.
© Frontline Medical Communications 2018-2021. Reprinted with permission, all rights reserved.