Menu Close
  • Clinical
    • In the Literature
    • Key Clinical Questions
    • Interpreting Diagnostic Tests
    • Coding Corner
    • Clinical
    • Clinical Guidelines
    • COVID-19
    • POCUS
  • Practice Management
    • Quality
    • Public Policy
    • How We Did It
    • Key Operational Question
    • Technology
    • Practice Management
  • Diversity
  • Career
    • Leadership
    • Education
    • Movers and Shakers
    • Career
    • Learning Portal
    • The Hospital Leader Blog
  • Pediatrics
  • HM Voices
    • Commentary
    • In Your Eyes
    • In Your Words
    • The Flipside
  • SHM Resources
    • Society of Hospital Medicine
    • Journal of Hospital Medicine
    • SHM Career Center
    • SHM Converge
    • Join SHM
    • Converge Coverage
    • SIG Spotlight
    • Chapter Spotlight
    • #JHM Chat
  • Industry Content
    • Patient Monitoring with Tech
An Official Publication of
  • Clinical
    • In the Literature
    • Key Clinical Questions
    • Interpreting Diagnostic Tests
    • Coding Corner
    • Clinical
    • Clinical Guidelines
    • COVID-19
    • POCUS
  • Practice Management
    • Quality
    • Public Policy
    • How We Did It
    • Key Operational Question
    • Technology
    • Practice Management
  • Diversity
  • Career
    • Leadership
    • Education
    • Movers and Shakers
    • Career
    • Learning Portal
    • The Hospital Leader Blog
  • Pediatrics
  • HM Voices
    • Commentary
    • In Your Eyes
    • In Your Words
    • The Flipside
  • SHM Resources
    • Society of Hospital Medicine
    • Journal of Hospital Medicine
    • SHM Career Center
    • SHM Converge
    • Join SHM
    • Converge Coverage
    • SIG Spotlight
    • Chapter Spotlight
    • #JHM Chat
  • Industry Content
    • Patient Monitoring with Tech

The Coming Windfall

In June the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) issued a notice proposing changes to the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule (MPFS) that, if enacted, would significantly increase Medicare payments to hospitalists for many services routinely performed. Because many private health plans use the Medicare-approved RVUs for their own fee schedules, it is anticipated that hospitalists will likely see payment increases for their non-Medicare services as well.

Resources

  • For a summary of the proposed rule, visit www.hospitalmedicine.org/AM/Template.cfm?Section=Advocacy_Policy&Template=/CM/ContentDisplay.cfm&ContentID=10204.
  • For a copy of the CMS press release on the proposed rule, go to www.cms.hhs.gov/apps/media/press/release.asp?Counter=1887
  • The proposed rule is available on the CMS Web site: www.cms.hhs.gov/PhysicianFeeSched/PFSFRN/itemdetail.asp?filterType=none&filterByDID=0&sortByDID=4&sortOrder=ascending&itemID=CMS1183724

The changes, which will take effect in January 2007 if enacted, reflect the recommendations of the Relative Value Update Committee (RUC) of the American Medical Association, along with input from SHM. At this point, however, they are only proposed changes that CMS could modify based on input from affected groups and Congress. SHM will continue to urge CMS to implement the proposed changes and we encourage all hospitalists and other interested individuals to send a letter to CMS indicating support for the proposed changes. (See “How to Show Your Support,” p. 15.) CMS is accepting comments on the rule until August 21, with the final ruling expected in November.

The suggested revisions—the largest ever proposed for services related to patient evaluation and management—are designed to improve the accuracy of payments to physicians for the services they furnish to Medicare beneficiaries. The proposed notice includes substantial increases for “evaluation and management” services (that is, time and effort that physicians spend with patients in evaluating their condition and advising and assisting them in managing their health).

The proposed notice addresses two components of physician payments under the MPFS:

The Effect of the Proposed Rule on E/M Codes Billed by Hospitalists

click for large version

click for large version

  1. A comprehensive review of physician work RVUs; and
  2. A proposed change in the methodology for calculating practice expenses.

“Medicare law requires CMS to assess the accuracy of the work relative values it assigns to physician-services every five years,” says SHM CEO Larry Wellikson, MD. “SHM, on behalf of our members, participated in a coalition of internal medicine groups, led by the American College of Physicians, which provided survey data and other evidence to the RUC to show that many services were undervalued compared to other physician services and that it was essential that their work RVUs be increased.”

Consistent with the RUC’s recommendations, CMS is proposing the largest increase in the work RVUs assigned to office and hospital visits and consultations since Medicare implemented its physician fee schedule in 1992. Many of these reflect double-digit increases for codes commonly billed by hospitalists:

  • The work RVU for initial hospital care (CPT code 99221) would increase by 47%;
  • The work RVU for subsequent hospital care (CPT code 99232) would increase by 31%; and
  • The work RVU for subsequent hospital care (CPT code 99233) would increase by 32%.

How to Show Your Support

This is a proposed rule, which CMS could modify based on input from affected groups and Congress. SHM will urge CMS to implement the proposed E/M work RVUs contained in the proposed rule in the 2007 physician fee schedule. We encourage you to send a letter to CMS indicating your support for the proposed changes. Your letter should:

  • Urge CMS to finalize the recommended work RVU increases for evaluation and management services.
  • Give examples of how the complexity and work associated with taking care of patients in the hospital has increased dramatically over the past 10 years.
  • Urge CMS to reject any efforts to lower the overall improvements in work RVUs for E/M services.

CMS will accept public comments regarding the proposed rule through Aug. 21, 2006. Comments can be submitted electronically by going to www.cms.hhs.gov/eRulemaking and clicking on “submit electronic comments on CMS regulations with open comment period.”

Or, you can mail your comments (send an original letter and two copies) to:

Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services

Department of Health and Human Services

Attention: CMS-1512-PN

P.O. Box 8014

Baltimore, MD 21244-8014

  • The Coming Windfall

    August 2, 2006

  • 1

    Locum Terrans

    July 1, 2006

  • 1

    Production-Based Compensation for Hospitalists Overlooked Too Often?

    July 1, 2006

  • Pediatric Special Section

    July 1, 2006

  • A Program in Transition

    July 1, 2006

  • In the Literature

    July 1, 2006

  • Evidenced-Based Medicine for the Hospitalist

    July 1, 2006

  • Death by Numbers

    July 1, 2006

  • Unlock a Career in Administration

    July 1, 2006

  • 100,000 Lives Campaign Reduces VAP

    July 1, 2006

1 … 939 940 941 942 943 … 968
  • About The Hospitalist
  • Contact Us
  • The Editors
  • Editorial Board
  • Authors
  • Publishing Opportunities
  • Subscribe
  • Advertise
fa-facebookfa-linkedinfa-instagramfa-youtube-playfa-commentfa-envelopefa-rss
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies.
    ISSN 1553-085X
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • SHM’s DE&I Statement
  • Cookie Preferences