Menu Close
  • Clinical
    • In the Literature
    • Key Clinical Questions
    • Interpreting Diagnostic Tests
    • Coding Corner
    • Clinical
    • Clinical Guidelines
    • COVID-19
    • POCUS
  • Practice Management
    • Quality
    • Public Policy
    • How We Did It
    • Key Operational Question
    • Technology
    • Practice Management
  • Diversity
  • Career
    • Leadership
    • Education
    • Movers and Shakers
    • Career
    • Learning Portal
    • The Hospital Leader Blog
  • Pediatrics
  • HM Voices
    • Commentary
    • In Your Eyes
    • In Your Words
    • The Flipside
  • SHM Resources
    • Society of Hospital Medicine
    • Journal of Hospital Medicine
    • SHM Career Center
    • SHM Converge
    • Join SHM
    • Converge Coverage
    • SIG Spotlight
    • Chapter Spotlight
    • #JHM Chat
  • Industry Content
    • Patient Monitoring with Tech
An Official Publication of
  • Clinical
    • In the Literature
    • Key Clinical Questions
    • Interpreting Diagnostic Tests
    • Coding Corner
    • Clinical
    • Clinical Guidelines
    • COVID-19
    • POCUS
  • Practice Management
    • Quality
    • Public Policy
    • How We Did It
    • Key Operational Question
    • Technology
    • Practice Management
  • Diversity
  • Career
    • Leadership
    • Education
    • Movers and Shakers
    • Career
    • Learning Portal
    • The Hospital Leader Blog
  • Pediatrics
  • HM Voices
    • Commentary
    • In Your Eyes
    • In Your Words
    • The Flipside
  • SHM Resources
    • Society of Hospital Medicine
    • Journal of Hospital Medicine
    • SHM Career Center
    • SHM Converge
    • Join SHM
    • Converge Coverage
    • SIG Spotlight
    • Chapter Spotlight
    • #JHM Chat
  • Industry Content
    • Patient Monitoring with Tech

In the Literature: Research You Need to Know

Clinical question: Does the incorporation of bar-code verification technology within an electronic medication-administration system (eMAR) reduce the rate of medication errors?

Background: More than a fourth of medication-related inpatient adverse events are due to errors. Bar-code verification technology reduces the incidence of such errors; however, the quantitative effect of implementing such technology is unknown.

Study design: Before-and-after quasi-experimental study.

Setting: Single academic tertiary-care medical center in Boston.

Synopsis: Investigators directly observed 14,041 medication administrations in patient units that did and did not have bar-code eMAR. They reported a 41.4% relative reduction (RR) in medication administration errors (11.5% error rate before versus 6.8% after adoption of this technology) and 50.8% RR in the rate of potential adverse drug events (3.1% versus 1.6%). Significant reductions in wrong medication, dose, and administration documentation errors were noted. Order transcription errors were completely eliminated (6% versus 0%). Although errors in medication administration timing fell by 27.3%, no significant difference in the number of potential adverse events related to timing errors was found.

The investigators estimated that approximately 145,000 potential adverse drug events would be prevented from amongst an annual 1.69 million medication orders.

Pre-existent computerized physician order entry and bar-code verification technology in the pharmacy at the study hospital might limit the generalization of these results. Additionally, potential, not actual, adverse drug events were reported. Lastly, the study compared early implementers with late implementers.

Bottom line: Bar-code verification technology substantially reduced the number of medication administration errors and associated adverse drug events and completely eliminated the occurrence of transcription errors.

Citation: Poon EG, Keohane CA, Yoon CS, et al. Effect of bar-code technology on the safety of medication administration. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(18):1698-1707.

Reviewed for TH eWire by Robert Chang, MD, Anita Hart, MD, Hae-won Kim, MD, Robert Paretti, MD, Helena Pasieka, MD, and Matt Smitherman, MD, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.

For more physician reviews of HM-related research, visit our website.

  • In the Literature: Research You Need to Know

    September 22, 2010

  • Safety of Inferior Vena Cava Filters Questioned

    September 15, 2010

  • Hospitalists in the Developing World

    September 15, 2010

  • Know Your Numbers, Your Market, Yourself

    September 8, 2010

  • Hospitalist Searches for Missing Link

    September 8, 2010

  • 1

    Analyze This

    September 1, 2010

  • Playground Politics

    September 1, 2010

  • Time to Get a Move On

    September 1, 2010

  • Innovators Descend on Annual Pediatric HM Conference

    September 1, 2010

  • N.C. Hospital Names Hospitalist Its Physician of the Year

    September 1, 2010

1 … 829 830 831 832 833 … 973
  • About The Hospitalist
  • Contact Us
  • The Editors
  • Editorial Board
  • Authors
  • Publishing Opportunities
  • Subscribe
  • Advertise
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies.
    ISSN 1553-085X
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • SHM’s DE&I Statement
  • Cookie Preferences