Menu Close
  • Clinical
    • In the Literature
    • Key Clinical Questions
    • Interpreting Diagnostic Tests
    • Coding Corner
    • Clinical
    • Clinical Guidelines
    • COVID-19
    • POCUS
  • Practice Management
    • Quality
    • Public Policy
    • How We Did It
    • Key Operational Question
    • Technology
    • Practice Management
  • Diversity
  • Career
    • Leadership
    • Education
    • Movers and Shakers
    • Career
    • Learning Portal
    • The Hospital Leader Blog
  • Pediatrics
  • HM Voices
    • Commentary
    • In Your Eyes
    • In Your Words
    • The Flipside
  • SHM Resources
    • Society of Hospital Medicine
    • Journal of Hospital Medicine
    • SHM Career Center
    • SHM Converge
    • Join SHM
    • Converge Coverage
    • SIG Spotlight
    • Chapter Spotlight
    • From JHM
  • Industry Content
    • Patient Monitoring with Tech
An Official Publication of
  • Clinical
    • In the Literature
    • Key Clinical Questions
    • Interpreting Diagnostic Tests
    • Coding Corner
    • Clinical
    • Clinical Guidelines
    • COVID-19
    • POCUS
  • Practice Management
    • Quality
    • Public Policy
    • How We Did It
    • Key Operational Question
    • Technology
    • Practice Management
  • Diversity
  • Career
    • Leadership
    • Education
    • Movers and Shakers
    • Career
    • Learning Portal
    • The Hospital Leader Blog
  • Pediatrics
  • HM Voices
    • Commentary
    • In Your Eyes
    • In Your Words
    • The Flipside
  • SHM Resources
    • Society of Hospital Medicine
    • Journal of Hospital Medicine
    • SHM Career Center
    • SHM Converge
    • Join SHM
    • Converge Coverage
    • SIG Spotlight
    • Chapter Spotlight
    • From JHM
  • Industry Content
    • Patient Monitoring with Tech

Comparing Screening Tools for Predicting Sepsis Among Children

CLINICAL QUESTION: Which screening tool performs best for early prediction of sepsis and septic shock in children per the Phoenix criteria?

BACKGROUND: Early recognition of sepsis remains challenging given heterogeneity in presentation. Existing screening tools have not yet been validated as defined by the recently developed Phoenix sepsis criteria.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study

SETTING: Single-center pediatric emergency department

SYNOPSIS: Among more than 47,000 patients with suspected infection, performance characteristics of qPS4, LqSOFA, and CHOP sepsis screening tools were compared for identifying patients meeting Phoenix criteria for sepsis or septic shock within 24 hours. Overall, qPS4 yielded the highest sensitivity, particularly in older age groups in which sepsis prevalence was higher. Moreover, qPS4 predicted sepsis (with or without shock) soonest, with a median, early-warning, lead time of 1.9 hours prior to fulfillment of Phoenix sepsis diagnostic criteria. However, qPS4 had slightly lower specificity, and all three tools demonstrated poor positive predictive value. Screening showed similar patterns in predicting septic shock, but with higher sensitivity and longer early warning lead-time.

BOTTOM LINE: qPS4 demonstrates superiority for predicting Phoenix sepsis and septic shock, although results were suboptimal in younger infants. Low positive predictive value highlights the importance of a “diagnostic pause” in situations of ambiguity and still obliges shrewd clinical judgment.

CITATION: Georgette N, et al. Comparing screening tools for predicting Phoenix criteria sepsis and septic shock among children. Pediatrics. 2025;155(5):e2025071155. doi: 10.1542/peds.2025- 071155.

Dr. Lammers

Dr. Lammers is a pediatric infectious disease and pediatric hospital medicine fellow at Nationwide Children’s Hospital in Columbus, Ohio.

Dr. Earl

Dr. Earl is an internal medicine and pediatric hospitalist at The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and Nationwide Children’s Hospital and an assistant professor of internal medicine and pediatrics at The Ohio State University College of Medicine, all in Columbus, Ohio

  • Comparing Screening Tools for Predicting Sepsis Among Children

    January 5, 2026

  • Significant Pathology in Young Infants Presenting with Hypothermia: A Multicenter Study

    January 5, 2026

  • Pediatric Nurses Provide Unique Perspectives on PFC Rounds

    January 5, 2026

  • BRUE Prediction Rules Outperform the AAP Higher-Risk Criteria in Estimating Risk for Serious Underlying Diagnosis

    January 5, 2026

  • Dexamethasone Non-Inferior to Prednisone or Prednisolone for Treatment of Pediatric Asthma Exacerbations

    January 5, 2026

  • Pediatric Catatonia’s Medical Turn: Increasing Incidence and Intensifying Treatment

    January 5, 2026

  • Nirsevimab Effectively Reduces RSV Infection and Hospitalizations

    January 5, 2026

  • Limited Diagnostic Yield from Specialty Consultation and Testing Following BRUE

    January 5, 2026

  • Less May Be More: Rethinking Antibiotic Use in Tracheostomized Children

    January 5, 2026

  • A Quality Improvement Initiative Significantly Improves Critical-Care Billing on a Pediatric Hospital Medicine Service

    January 5, 2026

1 … 4 5 6 7 8 … 985
  • About The Hospitalist
  • Contact Us
  • The Editors
  • Editorial Board
  • Authors
  • Publishing Opportunities
  • Subscribe
  • Advertise
  • Copyright © 2026 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies.
    ISSN 1553-085X
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Cookie Preferences