Menu Close
  • Clinical
    • In the Literature
    • Key Clinical Questions
    • Interpreting Diagnostic Tests
    • Coding Corner
    • Clinical
    • Clinical Guidelines
    • COVID-19
    • POCUS
  • Practice Management
    • Quality
    • Public Policy
    • How We Did It
    • Key Operational Question
    • Technology
    • Practice Management
  • Diversity
  • Career
    • Leadership
    • Education
    • Movers and Shakers
    • Career
    • Learning Portal
    • The Hospital Leader Blog
  • Pediatrics
  • HM Voices
    • Commentary
    • In Your Eyes
    • In Your Words
    • The Flipside
  • SHM Resources
    • Society of Hospital Medicine
    • Journal of Hospital Medicine
    • SHM Career Center
    • SHM Converge
    • Join SHM
    • Converge Coverage
    • SIG Spotlight
    • Chapter Spotlight
    • #JHM Chat
  • Industry Content
    • Patient Monitoring with Tech
An Official Publication of
  • Clinical
    • In the Literature
    • Key Clinical Questions
    • Interpreting Diagnostic Tests
    • Coding Corner
    • Clinical
    • Clinical Guidelines
    • COVID-19
    • POCUS
  • Practice Management
    • Quality
    • Public Policy
    • How We Did It
    • Key Operational Question
    • Technology
    • Practice Management
  • Diversity
  • Career
    • Leadership
    • Education
    • Movers and Shakers
    • Career
    • Learning Portal
    • The Hospital Leader Blog
  • Pediatrics
  • HM Voices
    • Commentary
    • In Your Eyes
    • In Your Words
    • The Flipside
  • SHM Resources
    • Society of Hospital Medicine
    • Journal of Hospital Medicine
    • SHM Career Center
    • SHM Converge
    • Join SHM
    • Converge Coverage
    • SIG Spotlight
    • Chapter Spotlight
    • #JHM Chat
  • Industry Content
    • Patient Monitoring with Tech

Assessing the risks associated with MRI patients with a pacemaker or defibrillator

Clinical Question: What are the risks of nonthoracic MRI in patients with pacemakers or implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD) who are not preapproved by the Food and Drug Administration for MRI scanning?

Background: Implantable cardiovascular devices could suffer heating in MRI magnetic fields leading to cardiac thermal injury and changes in pacing properties. The FDA approves “MRI-conditional devices” deemed safe for MRI, but up to six million patients worldwide (and two million in the United States) have non–MRI conditional devices.

Study Design: A prospective, multicenter registry of patients with non–MRI conditional pacemakers or ICDs.

Setting: U.S. Centers participating in the MagnaSafe registry.

Synopsis: Adults with non–MRI conditional pacemakers (1000 cases) or ICDs (500 cases) implanted in the thorax after 2001 were scanned with nonthoracic MRI at 1.5 Tesla. Patients with abandoned or inactive leads, other implantable devices, and low batteries and pacing-dependent patients with ICDs were excluded.

Devices were interrogated before each MRI and set to either no pacing or asynchronous pacing with all tachycardia and bradycardia therapies deactivated. Primary endpoints included immediate death, generator or lead failure, loss of capture in paced patients, new arrhythmia, and generator reset.

No patients suffered death or device or lead failure. Six patients developed self-terminating atrial arrhythmias, while an additional six had partial pacemaker electrical reset. Several devices had detectable changes in battery voltage, lead impedance, pacing threshold, and P- or R-wave amplitude without evident clinical significance. Multiple MRIs caused no increase in adverse outcomes. This study suggests that patients with non–MRI conditional devices may be at low risk from nonthoracic imaging if appropriately screened with temporary pacemaker function modification before MRI.

Bottom Line: Appropriately screened and prepared patients with non–MRI conditional thoracic pacemakers or ICDs may be at low risk for complications from nonthoracic MRI at 1.5 Tesla.

Reference: Russo RJ, Costa HS, Silva PD, et al. Assessing the risks associated with MRI in patients with a pacemaker or defibrillator. N Engl J Med. 2017;376:755-64.

Dr. Frederick is assistant clinical professor in the division of hospital Medicine, department of medicine, University of California, San Diego.

  • 1

    Assessing the risks associated with MRI patients with a pacemaker or defibrillator

    June 13, 2017

  • 1

    Hospitalists and cost control in the U.S. health care system

    June 12, 2017

  • 1

    Application of the MASCC and CISNE risk-stratification scores to identify low-risk febrile neutropenic patients in the emergency department

    June 12, 2017

  • 1

    Atrial fibrillation blunts beta-blockers for HFrEF

    June 11, 2017

  • 1

    Bedside CGM boosts glucose control in hospital

    June 10, 2017

  • 1

    Crossing the personal quality chasm: QI enthusiast to QI leader

    June 9, 2017

  • 1

    Low-dose aspirin bests dual-antiplatelet therapy in TAVR

    June 8, 2017

  • 1

    Everything We Say and Do: Setting discharge goals and visit expectations

    June 8, 2017

  • New SHM Members – February/March 2017

    June 7, 2017

  • 1

    Noninvasive therapy cut COPD readmissions

    June 7, 2017

1 … 452 453 454 455 456 … 968
  • About The Hospitalist
  • Contact Us
  • The Editors
  • Editorial Board
  • Authors
  • Publishing Opportunities
  • Subscribe
  • Advertise
fa-facebookfa-linkedinfa-instagramfa-youtube-playfa-commentfa-envelopefa-rss
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies.
    ISSN 1553-085X
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • SHM’s DE&I Statement
  • Cookie Preferences