Menu Close
  • Clinical
    • In the Literature
    • Key Clinical Questions
    • Interpreting Diagnostic Tests
    • Coding Corner
    • Clinical
    • Clinical Guidelines
    • COVID-19
    • POCUS
  • Practice Management
    • Quality
    • Public Policy
    • How We Did It
    • Key Operational Question
    • Technology
    • Practice Management
  • Diversity
  • Career
    • Leadership
    • Education
    • Movers and Shakers
    • Career
    • Learning Portal
    • The Hospital Leader Blog
  • Pediatrics
  • HM Voices
    • Commentary
    • In Your Eyes
    • In Your Words
    • The Flipside
  • SHM Resources
    • Society of Hospital Medicine
    • Journal of Hospital Medicine
    • SHM Career Center
    • SHM Converge
    • Join SHM
    • Converge Coverage
    • SIG Spotlight
    • Chapter Spotlight
    • From JHM
  • Industry Content
    • Patient Monitoring with Tech
An Official Publication of
  • Clinical
    • In the Literature
    • Key Clinical Questions
    • Interpreting Diagnostic Tests
    • Coding Corner
    • Clinical
    • Clinical Guidelines
    • COVID-19
    • POCUS
  • Practice Management
    • Quality
    • Public Policy
    • How We Did It
    • Key Operational Question
    • Technology
    • Practice Management
  • Diversity
  • Career
    • Leadership
    • Education
    • Movers and Shakers
    • Career
    • Learning Portal
    • The Hospital Leader Blog
  • Pediatrics
  • HM Voices
    • Commentary
    • In Your Eyes
    • In Your Words
    • The Flipside
  • SHM Resources
    • Society of Hospital Medicine
    • Journal of Hospital Medicine
    • SHM Career Center
    • SHM Converge
    • Join SHM
    • Converge Coverage
    • SIG Spotlight
    • Chapter Spotlight
    • From JHM
  • Industry Content
    • Patient Monitoring with Tech

Most patients meeting sepsis criteria in the emergency department do not have a sepsis diagnosis 

Dr. Taghvaei

Clinical question: What percentage of patients treated for sepsis in the ED are diagnosed with sepsis at discharge? 

Background: Sepsis is a leading cause of death around the world and the single most expensive diagnosis for inpatient care. Early intervention including invasive procedures, large-volume fluid resuscitation, and broad-spectrum empiric antibiotic therapy, have all demonstrated proven mortality benefits. 

Study design: Retrospective observational cohort study.

Setting: An urban academic ED in the U.S. upper Midwest with >100,000 visits per year

Synopsis: The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3), published in 2016, were used for inclusion criteria, with vital signs and laboratory results from the first six hours of presentation. Patients with a primary trauma diagnosis and those with missing ICD-9 codes were excluded from the study. 3,121 patients met the inclusion criteria of Sepsis-3 definitions and received IV antibiotics in the ED. Discharge criteria for sepsis diagnosis included explicit sepsis ICD-9 code listed and implicit infection plus end-organ damage and were used to determine the percentage of patients with a final diagnosis of sepsis. Approximately 30% of patients with suspected sepsis treated with early antibiotics were determined to have had a noninfectious cause of their physiologic derangement. In addition, 39% of patients with suspected sepsis who were not ultimately diagnosed with sepsis at discharge had at least one risk factor for potential harm from large-volume fluid resuscitation, including heart failure or cirrhosis. Combined, these results show potential harm due to overly sensitive sepsis criteria. The limitations of the study include single-site data, possible improvement in end-organ damage with early intervention, and coding errors. 

Bottom line: Sepsis criteria for early intervention need to be modified further to be more specific. Current guidelines for volume resuscitation and IV antibiotics may expose a large subset of patients without sepsis to potential harm.

Citation: Litell JM et al. Most emergency department patients meeting sepsis criteria are not diagnosed with sepsis at discharge. Acad Emerg Med. 2021 Jul;28(7):745-752. doi:10.1111/acem.14265.

Dr. Taghvaei is an assistant professor of medicine, division of hospital medicine, at the Emory School of Medicine, Atlanta.

  • Most patients meeting sepsis criteria in the emergency department do not have a sepsis diagnosis 

    February 3, 2022

  • Treatment of acute pain in adults with sickle cell disease in an infusion center versus the emergency department resulted in faster treatment and fewer hospitalizations

    February 3, 2022

  • Guardianship issues lead to unnecessarily prolonged hospitalizations

    February 3, 2022

  • 1

    Hospitalists demonstrate resiliency in the face of challenge

    February 3, 2022

  • Get…and stay…connected in the new year

    January 7, 2022

  • Addressing the nursing shortage

    January 7, 2022

  • SHM celebrates 25th anniversary as the home for hospital medicine

    January 7, 2022

  • Helping others find their joy

    January 7, 2022

  • What I wish I knew before becoming a hospitalist

    January 7, 2022

  • Hospitalist Movers and Shakers

    January 7, 2022

1 … 100 101 102 103 104 … 984
  • About The Hospitalist
  • Contact Us
  • The Editors
  • Editorial Board
  • Authors
  • Publishing Opportunities
  • Subscribe
  • Advertise
  • Copyright © 2026 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies.
    ISSN 1553-085X
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Cookie Preferences