The Verdict
The decision to participate in a medical malpractice case as an expert witness requires competence, accurate self-assessment, and integrity. A physician should testify only to what he or she genuinely believes to be the standard of care, regardless of which side approaches him or her. The physician should consider his or her current practice and expertise to decide if he or she can provide honest and accurate expert testimony.
He or she should keep in mind the interests of patients in having access to the courts and to fair compensation from injuries, and therefore physicians should have the courage and integrity to testify against colleagues when he or she genuinely believes that the colleague injured the plaintiff through a deviation from the standard of care. Society relies upon physicians to risk disfavor with colleagues in the interest of promoting justice and protecting patients when the physician believes that is the right thing to do. Physicians interested in policy issues around expert testimony should become involved in their professional societies to create and enforce quality standards for expert witnesses.
References
- Federal Rules of Evidence 701, 702, 703.
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow, 509 U.S. 579; 113 S. Ct. 2786; 125 L. Ed. 2d 469 (1993).
- American Medical Association Code of Medical Ethics, Discipline in Medicine, E-9.04 Available at www.ama-assn.org. Last accessed May 25, 2006.
- Feld AD, Carey WD. Expert witness malfeasance: how should specialty societies respond? Am J Gastroenterol. 2005 May;100(5):991-995.
- Gomez JCB. Silencing the hired guns: ensuring honesty in medical testimony. J Leg Med. 2005 Sep;26(3):385-399.